1. What are some of the main points you read about in the website above regarding manipulating images?
1. I read that doing photoshop is acceptable to certain extent. There are regulations for professional photographers, as how much they can manipulate a photo. Though there are people that believe that the rules don't apply for them. At the end photographers try not to change the photo much and if they do then most often they will change either the background or the light settings.
2. What is the philosophy of newspapers like the Washington Post and New York times regarding image manipulation?
2. In these bigger newspaper companies the companies set regulations to the photographers. As how much manipulation the photographers can do in one photo. They try not to manipulate the photos very much.
3. What do you think are acceptable things you could do to an image and not cross the line unto an unethical manipulation?
3. I think an acceptable thing would be to change the amount of light and that would be it. I believe that the background should stay the same and the original subject should also without changing and positioning of the parts of the subject.
1. I read that doing photoshop is acceptable to certain extent. There are regulations for professional photographers, as how much they can manipulate a photo. Though there are people that believe that the rules don't apply for them. At the end photographers try not to change the photo much and if they do then most often they will change either the background or the light settings.
2. What is the philosophy of newspapers like the Washington Post and New York times regarding image manipulation?
2. In these bigger newspaper companies the companies set regulations to the photographers. As how much manipulation the photographers can do in one photo. They try not to manipulate the photos very much.
3. What do you think are acceptable things you could do to an image and not cross the line unto an unethical manipulation?
3. I think an acceptable thing would be to change the amount of light and that would be it. I believe that the background should stay the same and the original subject should also without changing and positioning of the parts of the subject.
Unethical
This is an unethical cover because you wouldn't usually find a old lady on a motorcycle especially Ann Richards. Also the photo shop is horrible the head that got put on a role model looks crooked on the neck and looks horrible attached. It is easy to tell that the head does not belong to the body. Thats why i find this photo unethical.
Least Unethical
I Believe that this photo is the least Unethical because the body is the same and the only effect that was done is changing the light. And with that it still doesn't make a big difference. This is why i find this photo the least Unethical.
No comments:
Post a Comment